RE:ClaudeActually, didn’t watch her. Sounds like her speech was totally age-appropriate, though. I doubt it’ll have much impact, since her intended audience is too enamoured with themselves.
I haven’t seen a list of said scientists. Does it exist? Who appointed the so-called ambassadors? What are their qualifications? If I can’t trust the rest of the article, why would I believe they are qualified? Who do they represent and in what forum? I haven’t seen any evidence from them to dispute!
There are thousands of scientists and other professionals that would counter that list of 500, anyway. So, back to square one.
Give me facts, I’ll listen. Until then, I don’t need any 2for1 cookware.
Anyway, this is OT. Policy needs to address demand. VET (and others) supply what customers are still demanding more of and what still makes the world go round. Targetting them (and us) is a red herring.
trevorjplows wrote: Ditto from me Claude. I normally have a fair degree of respect foe Sadies posts but not in this case. It appears that hysterical little Swedish nutcase has played a few chords on his heartstrings. Sadie , where do you get off portraying any evidence from scientists disputing the prevailing fearmongering , politically correct agenda as been from paid lobbyiests. Of course all their dire predictions over the last 60years have come true , yeah sure. Over the last 60years Hollywood has flooded the screen with their ecodisaster films ,always blaming bad business decisions for these catastrophes. Maybe you and others like you have watched to many of these not for the entertainment factor but because it supports your percieved reality. Regards Claude and the Oil industry trevor.