RE:UpdatePretty fine post! Thanks.
quantumtrader wrote: 1) Just so we’re clear, we don’t EXACTLY need the Euro patent. From my understanding, management has a plan for each and every outcome concerning patent approval across the various countries. There are incredible routes that both include and don’t include the EU patent, but getting it would be optimal. The question is not whether QNC will be profitable and lucrative, but rather to what extent of market dominance we will assume.
2) Insider buying: you cannot compare QNC to a multinational company worth billions (yet). Any tidbit of info at this stage in a company’s life is critical, thus venture exchange companies are restricted to different and specific buying behaviours. And even if they could buy without stepping into a legal gray-area, they can’t! Simply not enough shares trade! The only way they could assume a significant position is to buy at exorbitant levels, at which point they would surely be accused of pumping/dumping and insider trading. The only logical way is in the form of options/warrants and through entrance via secondary offering. Read their bios please, as they have a plethora of experience working with these types of venture companies and designing their capital structures as efficiently as possible
I cannot see how people are angry with management for not reporting news 24/7 (they cannot post unofficial patent stuff, as that would be downright unprofessional). I also don’t understand why we aren’t applauding their restricted buying activity. Can you imagine how painful it is for them not being able to buy in when they know what this technology is capable of?? This level of patience and composure deserves praise, not complaints.