RE:RE:who knows, Exactly - He needs some money and decided to sell some of his stocks to do so. Sucks for him to have to sell at such a low price. Everyone is reading to much into the fact that the guy does have a personal life outside the company and like all of us needs money to perhaps put money down on a house or decide to be mortgage free. You guys want company executives to never enjoy the fruits of their labour?
These narrow sighted negative pansies on this board would still claim the same rhetoric no matter what price he sold shares at. Why have options or shares if you never intend to sell and enjoy the money.
ArimaForecast wrote: You're right, if I see the others are selling soon, there will be a problem. I will sell all my shares. But if there is only one person who sells or buys, there are many possibilities. Especially when he's forced to sell half at a 52-week low, i think it's a personal reason. All of us, we need someday a certain amount of money for eventualities of life.
jpm59 wrote: maybe Fowler is moving to another company ( conflict of interest) or "Mrs. Fowler" wants half his assets, "personal reasons". Regardless, Supreme, as a company, is generating great revenue, customers want 7 Acres product, so as a company they are fine. Regardless of the industry pump & over valuation of companies, Supreme generates growing revenue and with the loss of a few grow rooms,, it will just produce for the next quarter.As a company they are fine, not like some others that are not even producing. We'll see next week Fowlers/company's response. But no other insiders are seling.