RE:RE:RE:12 m of 52 g/t gold (Intercepts to Date)Exactly Sunnee! Everyone should pin this post to their fridge!
Personally I don’t care if this or any other company finds a mine. I just want to make money and I’m assuming everyone else here does as well. The chances of any exploreco. finding a mine are pretty much zilch. That doesn’t mean that we can’t make money speculating.
And you want to put yourself in the best position to do so. Well, look what we have here. Strong results from two holes with several more to go. And this is the killer...we know there’s visible gold in the other holes. So, I like the chances that BMK reports further strong intersections...that the market responds kindly to that news....and that the sp continues its rise....and I along with other investors continues to make money...That’s it.
SuneeDaze wrote: All the silly posts below aside...
As an investor/speculator, I ask myself, "What is the probability that the company will generate similar or better follow up results to those already provided?"
And knowing what we know about the visual reports already provided (so far all follow up holes contained visible gold with 005 containing multiple zones of vg), the probability of similar or better results are pretty solid, and I feel well worth the risk at this price. But that's just me.
Take care.
SuneeDaze wrote: UptownGirl wrote: Pretty impressive when you look at intersections of the first two holes in this program...
SM-19-001:
** 12 m of 52 g/t gold (incl. 3 m of 210 g/t gold) **
** 5.5 m of 5.73 g/t gold (incl. 1.5 m of 17 g/t gold) **
** 7.3 m of 11 g/t gold (incl. 1 m of 77 g/t gold) **
SM-19-002:
** 7.6 m of 8.6 g/t gold (incl. 4.2 m of 14 g/t gold) **
** 15.3 m of 3.2 g/t gold (incl. 0.9 m of 23 g/t gold) **
Also, recent grab samples ranged as high as 18.5 g/t gold as well as accessory metal assays that graded up to 0.21% nickel, 0.16% cobalt and 0.024% copper.