RE:RE:RE:Predictions, recommendations , and pain I chased down a few of these guys on a couple of other boards, and they are all the same.
They seem to have so much confidence and bluster, and can convince newbies.
You can see right through it, and as soon as you try to have a factual discussion with them, they try to pretend that the data is not real, they ask you to produce the data, and they say that we are miss quoting the data once you do that.
Then if you provided the direct posting, they won’t respond to you.
Then they’ll start a separate thread like mouse and make a cryptic comment without naming you calling you a charlatan
So on the one hand there’s an approach to deny, ask for data, and then accuse you of miss quoting or misrepresenting the data.
Then there’s an attempt to discredit.
Of course it’s so easy simply just to call someone a Basher and then try to make it sound like they’re trying to short the stock war buy your shares
They are so consistently confident, that one almost believes them, unless you check facts and you know how to pick out these types of characters
It is so easy, if you understand the financials, to have an argument with these guys and realized that they are a mile wide and an inch deep
Of course, there is no recourse here
I ran into another One of these guys on another board HSM , And after the company crashed, he said oh it’s easy to say this in retrospect
Problem is, it wasn’t retrospect it was at the time, consistently talking about the pitfalls of these types of companies
To me, it is pathetic, and of the lowest ethics.
Both mouse and Niet/Stetson openly encouraged people to buy all the way down.
There should be some recourse for this