RE:inquiring minds want to know...
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: paulb@patriot1tech.com [
Paul Borselli, VP, Marketing & Communication]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 4:13:09 PM
Subject: Re: Patent Process PAT potencial investor
I see the patent from McMaster has finally was issued.I am wondering why after all this time, Patriot One does not have the patent assigned to them. Martin referred to "additional patents as we further advance in our own proprietary development "As such is there other patents Patriot one has licensed that I am not seeing on the website?
Also the FCC allowed for only a large floor and wall scanner and police and law enforcement use only; will that now change?I am told the frequencies Patriot One are using are problematic; can you respond to that?
Sincerely
Kevin Garski
I had asked Natalia Niklova for her comments and she also told me to contact Patriot One directly
__________________________________________________________________________________________
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:09:14 PM
Subject: Patriot One on FCC (sorry I had not heard back from you)
Can you confirm a change in the website See: https://patriot1tech.com/solutions/patscan-cmr/
Towards the bottom of the page it says
"APPROVALS... IC: 22739-CMR (Approved), CE, FCC, UL (in progress)" Is the company now in the process of getting a new FCC license for PATSCAN?
If not, was that D-wall imaging FCC approval granted for PATSCAN use back in 2017?
Patriot One Receives FCC Approval for PATSCAN CMR Paving Way for Commercial Roll-Out
02/10/2017 • Corporate News
Which is it?
Sincerely
Kevin Garski
I see the patent Patriot One is using finally was issued... congrats on that!
I am wondering why after all this time, Patriot One does not have the patent assigned to them.
Also the FCC allowed for only a large floor and wall scanner; will that now change?
I am told the frequencies Patriot One are using are problematic; can you respond to that?
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:33:22 PM
Subject: Re: Patriot One on FCC (sorry I had not heard back from you) FURTHER (2)
At this point today, can you point PATSCAN[CMR] in public using the FCC license to radiate people in a public place. Yes or no?
In Las Vegas could you go to any street with the public and radiate people using PATSCAN[CMR]? Yes or No?
In Canada, is this a screening technology? Can you point it at people (in Canada) and radiate people with PATSCAN[CMR]? Yes or No?
Sincerely
Kevin Garski
Still no response from the company so I emailed Daniel Carlson from Tailwinds
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "Daniel Carlson" <daniel@tailwindsresearch.com>
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 1:36:21 PM
Subject: Re: From Tailwinds reader (further 4- final)
I WAS WRONG I read here about the FCC certifications. I now see that they do have "The TCB will send you a Grant of Equipment Authorization, which allows you to legally market and sell your product in the U.S."
However, if you read the whole document, FCC is certifying the "d" wall scanner which is not the security screening apparatus we have all been waiting for them to roll out.This would imply PATSCAN CMR is not certified. If so what will they roll-out ?
Kevin
ps Still no response from the company [refers to Patriot One]
in fairness to John Martin I finally get a response
From: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
To: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 9:29:35 AM
Subject: Re: Patriot One on FCC (sorry I had not heard back from you) FURTHER (2)
Kevin,
As I am on holidays with my family can I call you when I am back in the office on Tuesday to discuss?
John Martin
Manager Investor Relations
_______________________________________________________________________________________ From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 10:12:04 AM
Subject: Re: Patriot One on FCC (sorry I had not heard back from you) FURTHER (4)
Just so your aware I did try Paul on one of those e-mails and he also never got back to me from an e-mail APril 25 I think it was
Enjoy holidays anyway
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 11:28:27 AM
Subject: Re: Patriot One on FCC (sorry I had not heard back from you) FURTHER (4) number
I am this number right now ( in and out) if that was you calling earlier I could not get to the phone quickly
Failing that my cel number is 204 799- 1252 Thanks
Look forward to it
Sincerely
From: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
To: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:34:48 PM
Subject: Re: Patriot One on FCC (sorry I had not heard back from you) FURTHER (4) number
Kevin,
I did try and will have to call you after market.
John Martin
Manager Investor Relations
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
I wrote an article In May outlining my concerns; I attached the article to the email below and ask that Patriot One respond in writing so that I can share the answers with all shareholders...
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 12:57:19 PM
Subject: Article on Patriot One Technologies
I have attached the article I told you I was working on I have given you the questons to repond to and you have kindly
called a couple times sorry I was not quick enough to get to the phone.
You have my cel number but at this point I would prefer you answer the questions in writing so there is not confusion
when I prepare the end of the article conclusions.
Have a great long weekend
Kevin Garski
Instead , during the long weekend, the Tailwinds article appears which attempts to answer the questions I ask about the wall scanner ( they confirm) ; the FCC issues (they confirm) This question needs to be answered "However, if you read the whole document, FCC is certifying the "d" wall scanner which is not the security screening apparatus we have all been waiting for them to roll out.This would imply PATSCAN CMR is not certified. If so what will they roll-out?"
Kevin
Q&A with Patriot One’s CEO Martin Cronin
By
Daniel Carlson May 21, 2019
From: "K. Garski" <pancake2@mymts.net>
To: "John Martin" <johnm@patriot1tech.com>
Cc: martinc@patriot1tech.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 11:30:53 AM
Subject: John, still waiting for an answer...
John, I have been waiting for an answer to my question in regards to PATSCAN CMR ; please get an answer for my from the company; I have Cc Martin Cronin as well
"At this point today, can you point PATSCAN CMR (whatever version) in public using the FCC license to radiate people in a public place. Yes or no?
Eventually, I did a google search "FCC PATRIOT ONE" AND WAS SHOCKED TO FIND the request for waiver and experiment appears confirming that the company was in fact asking the FCC for a new license for CMR knowing full well the frequencies they were requesting to test on inferfer with several frequencies already allocated to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the like. Then, in early June I sent an email to the FCC outining my concerns. The problem is I sent it to the wrong department. The hotline is not the place to sent that email. Oct 7th, I sent it to the right place, here: https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us .
I also sent questions to PAT lawyer Ms.Frappier asking why PAT was only requestiing a waiver now after PAT one made it clear the device PATSCAN CMR was already in use and I show multiple occasions where PAT shows the device being used publically or was that just a fancy demonstration (I ask). I never got a response from Ms. Frappier. SO I asked Chief Plummer of UND and the adinistration at UND if they were aware the device was restircted use only. The University actually responded saying "The UND Police Department holds a license issued by the Federal Communications Commission’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau to operate a transmitter in the Public Safety Radio Pool as required." They went further saying "He is unaware of the additional Patriot One Technologies wavier requests to the FCC as this is outside of our testing requirements with version one of the PATSCAN CMR and we are only testing within the original parameters." SO UND was unaware of the waier request by fully aware of the V 1/2 issues - thats very interesting. In a followup email I made UND fully aware that if they were actually using the deviceon human beings to my knowledge its never been tested or approved for use on human beings- it was the only reasonable thing to do as i would not want to see people injured as a result of using the device.
I also reached out to the Westgate Hotel people and got no response.