Listen to last agm what they answered the questionWhen they where asked why they kept 10 million debt on the books and they put pli’s ip and assets as collateral Galbraith stated we didn’t want to dilute shares. Do you believe that was the real reason the kept that 10 million debt listen to what best said
When several people will be questioned under oath the truth will come out
imagine when people like kory sorenson,Louise menard,pl,Simon best,ex and current board members,pli’s scientist who can clearly tells us why few checkpoints are taking so long,fda correspondence, big pharma’s Negotiators who dealt with pli telling us why not one company was interested in partnering with pli why they where not interested in buying some assets ,did the fact thomvest had pli’s Ip and assets as collateral maybe a problem,when they stated we had no choice in shutting down the atm they just approved few months before up to 50 million ;why approve an atm and shut it down. It will be easy to see if it’s true they had no choice ;
same thing with ivig we had to put it on hold (why put on hold a phase 3 drug) and they take a q50 accounting write down that they will benefit from read the details Is it true they had no choice
is it true they had exhausted all options to raise capital to continue and they had ONLY ONE OPTION AND THAT WAS TO DECLARE HARDSHIP AND WIPE OUT RETAIL INVESTORS AND TAKEOVER PLI
‘the truth will come out