RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Premium to NAVanubis44 wrote: Reluctance to buy LBS at current price might have something to do with this:
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=LBS.TO
The stock is .36 above its 50 day moving average, and .46 above its 200 day moving average.
You can't look at charts to predict price direction for split share funds though. Prices for split share commons is mostly determined by
Net
Asset
Value. At the time I posted my original post LBS was trading at $0.05 premium over NAV. Meanwhile DFS (which I also hold) had an almost identitical NAV but was trading at a premium over NAV of roughly 20 times that of LBS. With those kind of premiums to NAV clearly LBS returns a higher yield and so should be more attractive - yet the reverse is true.