RE:RE:RE:RE:WolfpackIf you bring up the past or share price they will brush you aside and will assume you're butthurt lol Better if we nail them with forward looking questions and scrutinize their high paying jobs. I don't mind paying 10m AFTER Simon delivers. Pay should be based on performance, pr compensation should be based on performance. We are on welfare mode at the moment at aph, pr gets their paycheck regardless, ceo gets his paycheck regardless. This is where I will be focusing, show me your weight before asking for money.
AmorFatiforlife wrote: Respectfully I have to agree with some of kingbears points. I think that forward looking questions would be a better use of time for shareholders.. while I agree that transparency to stockholders is a vital part of a business. Nothing can be done to undo the past. I share all of the frustration with the longs on the board here as the ebbs and flows of this ride has been draining, but rehashing old wounds will not serve anyone. I would rather like to here about where the company is going from this point forward, and hold the current BOD and temp CEO accountable for carrying us into the future. Regards