Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cullinan Metals Corp V.CMT


Primary Symbol: C.CMT Alternate Symbol(s):  CMTNF

Cullinan Metals Corp. is a Canadian mining and exploration company focused on the development of energy metals. The Company is focused on energy resources, such as copper, graphite and lithium assets. Its projects include Smiley Lithium Project, Lac-Des-Iles West Graphite Project and Wakeman Lake Lithium Project. The Smiley Lithium Property consists of around five mining claims comprising approximately 1,902 hectares located 55 kilometers (km) north of Thunder Bay, Ontario. The Smiley Lake Lithium property is located in northwestern Ontario where numerous lithium deposits have been delineated to host significant reserves of lithium oxide (Li2O). The Lac-Des-Iles West Graphite Project consists of around 43 mineral claims in one contiguous block covering approximately 2276 hectares land, near the town of Mont-Laurier in southern Quebec. The highly prospective Wakeman Lake Lithium Project covers approximately 7,900 acres and is located in Northwestern Ontario.


CSE:CMT - Post by User

Comment by thamthamon Oct 28, 2019 11:44am
137 Views
Post# 30276700

RE:I am worried, so should you.

RE:I am worried, so should you.
That's why AGRA had to throw in that 20% buy-in and SOW got a lot more than 40M in return for their investment. Your figure confirmed that. This is business. It was win-win for both. AGRA was still one of the better performers in this sector even after coming back from their highs earlier this year and holding well. You can say if they were to invest that 40M in another company, they'd likely not get that much if not losing money, since AGRA was undervalued and many others were overvalued. Honestly, at the time of the JV announcement, there were some other bigs looking for greenhouse space, that prospect of having partial ownership of PSC, you think it would be hard? Though I would think AGRA or Houweling preferred smaller entity so they have more control.

You can keep arguing about the figure, let's do it this way. Okay, so SOW has over 400M shares of AGRA, including about 400M shares to be distributed to shareholders. If you say based on that, SOW's valuation should be around 100M. Fine, but that's not how it works because you can't say those almost 400M really belonged to shareholders. When they're unlocked and people sell, the money from the sales won't go to SOW but the people themselves. Then where do you justify SOW's valuation being half of AGRA's valuation? Think about it.

I already read it. Doesn't mean much. Bad management and no stable supplier before, AGRA can solve that. And if you based your belief of what people think of the deal on today's trading, you really haven't been paying attention what's been going on the last few months. It's not just AGRA but the whole sector in general. Even if the license is issued, may not see a sustained big boost either until the whole sector recovers.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>