RE:RE:RE:Canopy's drinksHahah, the lids are a bit much, and, I agree, they do look stupid, but they were to be expected. Again, I fully agree with you the laws should be similar to alcohol as for advertising and packaging. A single serve cannabis drink needs to have a child proof label however, a multi serve alcohol bottle does not - just does not make any sense. I am just happy the whole bottle is not covered with warning labels and HC made it so a bike helmet and a cup is not required to use the product. I am not too sure about adding any complications to the bottling process; however, I do know there is an added cost. A year ago I think Jeff touched up on this in one of his interviews just can not seem to fully remember which one. Cheers
CptLonbeard wrote: Honestly, I never post, but the sight of those lids made me unneccessarily angry. Personally, I think this looks stupid and unattractive to consumers, like drinking medicine. Hey, let me just chug this bottle of Pepto.
This isn't done for Alcohol, it shouldn't be done for a THC beverage. I get the need for it on the candies, a child is very likely to eat a package of gummy bears, but for this...
Sorry, rant over.... Thanks for posting! I wonder how much complication this style of lid adds to the bottling lines.