Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.


GREY:NMKEF - Post by User

Post by Tcheckon Oct 31, 2019 2:07pm
81 Views
Post# 30293189

gb shouldnt be sitting or sleeping in a boardchair

gb shouldnt be sitting or sleeping in a boardchair
the board is there to keep him awake and on his feet .

from cnn
There is still plenty of debate over the best way to structure boards. But there has been a growing belief -- particularly among institutional and activist investors -- that the more independent the leadership of a board, the better.

ceo shouldnt be boardchair as well.
a majority of large, publicly traded US companies  are now opting to keep those two roles separate.

 
A corporate board, after all, is charged with the hiring, firing and oversight of CEOs and planning for a company's future.

ISS also asked investors what reasons would "most strongly suggest" the need to separate the roles. The top three were poor responsiveness to shareholder concerns, practices that weaken or reduce board accountability (e.g. not permitting shareholders to call a special meeting), and a corporate crisis such as a product failure.

from cnn
Should CEOs double as board chairs?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>