RE:RE:RE:This thing is toast.HornstGornkl wrote: Would an investment just shy of 100k satisfy you.
screw you and your silly bot it’s nonsense. That bot hurts us in middling trades.
if the tech is good this bot gets blown out of the water as only an idiot would not invest in a company with such tech in such a space,
dont blame the bot. An institutional investor(s) would be all over this like Oprah on a canned ham if this tech had even the slightest chance of working out.
But theyre not. Why?
Theres a laundry list of reasons corporately. Even your blind faith can see how poorly run and executed this company is.
my point is not even that would hamper further investment. Unless....... The tech isn’t as solid as we are led to believe.
Wouldnt be be the first time. And we will be left holding the bag. Your rosy, positive attitude don’t mean sh$t. Revenue does. And it ain’t around.
i sure as sugar hope I’m dead wrong.
its fair to be upset, many are. Many of us are holding bags. However, look at the last news and the turnover of shares. There's new investment money and turnover between 0.12-0.15. Management recently bought in at 0.16, you're telling everyone that you know all and are claiming the company and tech are garbage out of good faith? You've admitted you have had it, fair enough, sell and move along. You got your piece out, now enjoy your next move. But as CBG mentioned, don't come crying back when this rises to the next level shortly. Everything is lining up for this to shoot up. I think you'd be mistaking to sell off 100k investment, likely for a loss based on your tone, to not stick it out for another month or two. This quarter should see greater revenue and if there was truth to the insurance provider deal, these revenues could be substantially greater compared to prior quarters. But hey, the ball is in your court. Ps, I think everyone here appreciates a conversation with substance, not a mindless spew of crrap. Thank you for the comment with substance.