Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Newcastle Minerals Ltd A.NCM


Primary Symbol: V.NCM



TSXV:NCM - Post by User

Post by miningmanon Nov 02, 2019 12:30pm
194 Views
Post# 30301015

Stope availabilty, a serious analysis and problem

Stope availabilty, a serious analysis and problemThe ongoing   reference to   "  inadequate stope availabilty"   as an  excuse for production shortfalls   doesnt sit well at all.

Heres  post of  mine from  Aug  2017.......  over 2 years ago!!!!!!........ that clearly identified a need for  seven  stopes in  production  at all times    Joe O  confirmed this number several times over the last   two years.

https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.pvg/pretium-resources-inc?postid=26572794


N
ote that  the PVG  press release of the same date    alluded to 27   additional  stopes being developed at that time.    A   later    release stated that  a total of  42  were either in production  or being prepped ready for production.      This I thought was a major step  in  the right direction.  

Yesterdays  CC,   Joe stated there were 6 or 7  stopes in pfoduction   and the temporary loss of one stope   was the prime cause of  the missed production.  Untill   this weekend I suspected that   inadequate  quantities of fill   was the obvious explanation for  "stope unavailability"  Think about it,   if two years is inadequate to  get to where they need to be ,  how  much longer do they need??


Then  I finally woke up.  1000  metres of development monthly is an obscene amount  of development  to undertake  in parrallel  with feeding a mill......... regardless of the size of the mill.    They probably have dozens of stopes  semi prepared   ,  ready for productiion.  When  Joe says  we have a problem with inadequate  number of stopes ,  what he really means is wehave a problem with inadequate number of stopes,   WHICH  WILL SUPPLY A HEAD GRADE IN EXCESS OF 8 GRAMS.

Obviously if one is trying for mill grades of   say 10 or 11  grams,    one can only  take a certain  amount  of lower grade tonnage.    

If you go back to Q2   2017 ,  look at the head grades when  Cleo   was being mined.    Thats what everyone here has been  waiting for.  Guess what???    If another Cleo has not been identified  and mined over a 2 year period,   then  these   jewellry boxes are not ubiquitous   as Joe stated   numerous times.  

That is why   this mine is looking  increasingly like a 7  or 8  gram operation....


The   shortfall in tonnage in  Q3     is a double whammy in  the making.    I am sure the mill can handle 3800 tpd  but they've never been   effectively   challenged.   Joe   and co will have to  decide  on   3800  tonnes at perhaps  7 grams or   3300   tonnes at  8 grams.

I look forward to  serious  counter arguments , backed up by facts,  not backed up by Joes ongoing  grossly  overoptimistc  estimates ,  with selective dissemination of relevant facts
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>