OTCPK:NGLD - Post by User
Comment by
SuneeDazeon Nov 04, 2019 6:56pm
70 Views
Post# 30307756
RE:RE:Results to Date
RE:RE:Results to DateTypically yes. Having said that, though, you have to realize that the attractiveness of the oxide zones is the cost effective manner that they can be mined (open pit) and especially processed (heap leaching).
There are mines in Nevada operating profitably with grades as low as 0.5 g/t gold...yes, 1/2 g. We have grades over considerable thicknesses up to 4 g/t gold....yep, up to 8 x the grade of other profitable Nevada mines.
There’s currently under 45 million shares (under $ 10 mil. market cap). At some point, the metrics of this company will be recognized and rewarded.
hillcrester18 wrote: Okay. So these results all came from an oxidized zone, right? So...would there not be a deeper more rich sulphide zone? May be not as convenient to mine depending on depth but just curious.
SuneeDaze wrote: Impressive to look at the first 3 holes that have been released of the 10 hole program. As we know, every one hit significant mineralization over considerable widths at shallow depths.
BL-19-01
84 m of 1.4 g/t gold
Including 29 m of 3.3 g/t gold
Including 14 m of 4.97 g/t gold
BL-19-02
85 m of 1.01 g/t gold
Including 32 m of 2.01 g/t gold
BL-19-04
122 m of 1.19 g/t gold
Including 37 m of 2.1 g/t gold (including 15 m of 3.3 g/t gold)
AND 12 m of 3.3 g/t gold