RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ph2 resultsClaridge wrote
Endeavor48 ... You are correct.
If Toade1313 expects a specific news release everytime a patient is enrolled or treated, then he'll be deceived. This is not a kindergarden. And it wouldn't make that professional that TLT publishes that often.
What TLT can subtly do is, through different news releases, hint us about progresses, just like they did recently. But don't expect to hear about something specific on the first 25 patients.
As for interim data @3-month, there are 2 fairly legitimate options we can expect, depending on how fast on-boarding in the US goes:
- if pace is not as fast as expected for whatever reasons, TLT could produce data related to canadian patients
- if pace goes as expected, TLT will most probably want to include data from US patients, given the exposure, the FDA, etc ...
Take also into account that the AUA meeting will be held early May. They could also decide to synch. with it, given the high visibility they could get toward their primary audience; urologists; those that will want to integrate this technology in their future practice. That would be fair to assume they would want to capitalize on that opportunity, to create a buzz. That would facilitate any future discussions with big pharmas regarding distribution rights, the greater the buzz is.
My personal bet is that we won't hear about 3-month interim data before mid-2020 and they it will include US data and that it will include enough patients 15-20) so nobody could dispute the statistical significance. But I'd be glad to be wrong on that mid-2020 target. Especially considering the AUA meeting in May.
We'll see. In the meantime, discussions have taken place with sites, as per the recent news releases. So there's little reasons to be insecure. It's a question of time, not if.
_______________________
Endeavor48 - (11/14/2019 3:13:05 PM)
RE:RE:RE:Ph2 results toade you're assuming because we haven't recieved an n.r on the matter,that they have only treated two so far...fwiw I was told by public relations that they would not necessarily be releasing an n.r everytime a patient is treated...Perhap's there are currently more then two treated??
Hi Claridge I believe what you think will be the coarse TLT should take after the IND and patient 1 &2 3 month results are released as initially this will say in a very loud voice we are on the right track. Yes it would become almost meaningless to release after each enrollment and even after awhile the 3 month 100%CRs maybe at one point groups of 5 and of course anything significant. Hand holding will stop but again only after the desired results are obvious. Claridge your posts are much appreciated.. thanks