RE:RE:RE:RE:Analyst coverage is worthlessYes, they really have to get their finance issues turned around soon. I'm starting to feel like I'm looking at the bottom of a "Cracker Jack Box" for a big sales win again. There's no question rapid progress is being made however it's so sporadic it's hard on the nerves and makes it very difficult to value the company. So, for me I prefer to price the shares accordingly and discount the analysts because they all want the underwriting business they obviously see as inevitable, so they talk all the positives. I also use a statistical measure of eliminating the two standard deviations of results at both ends of the bell curve. It's tough on smaller companies but it allows me to identify great strengths and identify weakness and how quickly the company addresses and capitalizes on the things that need to be taken care of. It also provides me with an accurate picture of what the company is worth in the context of what is clearly still a speculation. On the correct comments that more than one company can succeed is obvious. But some will be "Failure to thrives" and will be in the emergency too often. It's very tough to decide exactly where I want to be in this picture. Whatever we all do hopefully no one takes a life changing hit with this company. The majority of posters want us all to do well. More good guys and smart guys here than trouble makers. Respect to all.