RE:RE:RE:I smell fraudIt does appear there is a conflict in what has actually taken place and what has been reported. It suggests payment has not been made so far. But does not say time has elapsed beyond where pament can be made.
However there is a conflict in statements as to the property having been transferred. If reported the securities commission recieve a complaint of false reporting to share holders they will look into it and if laws are being violated. Will require reports to be updated or corrected. If they are listed on the nex board or CSE like Roca mines much of the reporting is not mandatory. However on the TSX.V where SEK is listed it is and is required.
It doesn't hurt to have the securities look at it being there is a obvious conflict being put forth by the two parties. There is no liability on the reporter for bringing it the the attention of the authorities. Investor reportings is how they become aware of violations.
Here is the link to the securities exchange. I would simply forward them a copy of yesterdays news report and ask if they would have a look to perhaps correct any possible violation or ommitance of info on behalf of investors.
https://ca.research.net/r/bcsc-complaint-form