RE:RE:RE:Santa Ana encumbrance and fraudulent transactionThat's an easy one. My point is that the post by Lookingdeeper01, ( that concerned you so much you called the TSXV about it), is not a cause for concern, as judged by the stock price which is the ultimate arbitrator of such matters. Before Lookingdeeper01 posted the stock was at $0.095, today it closed at $0.12. Why would the stock gain 26% in value if the charges of "encumbrance and fraudulent transaction had merit. I believe there was some hanky panky in the transaction. I read all Lookingdeeper01's posts on Stockhouse. He is an articulate, technically savvy, and a most professional poster. I cannort imagine he would have posted what he did on 11.29 unless their was substance behind it. However the action of the stock price, the 26% gain since his posting, indicates the issues that concerned him have been addressed, or are being taken care of.