OTCPK:HBAYF - Post by User
Comment by
Bookendson Dec 14, 2019 9:26pm
131 Views
Post# 30456121
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote Postponed
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote PostponedI guess Catalyst was only requesting that the OSC delay or block the plan or arrangement.
Of course, there is no way that the OSC would try to break a transaction themselves and so to have it delayed was the easy decision to please everyone.
I'm wondering why Catalyst didn't ask to have Baker and Leith withdraw from their functions on the board of directors due to a lack of fiduciary duty? This is what the OSC needs to start doing... Crack down on these obvious cases where people that should be looking for all stakeholder's interest choose to prioritize exclusively their own interest.
bmeister2 wrote: Typical osc bullsheit as usual trying to please everyone and doing nothing in the end. Solution is for Baker and his crowd to ante up to Catalyst offer or take his toys and go home. Not impressed with his antics.