GREY:CNTTQ - Post by User
Comment by
pulverizeron Dec 20, 2019 9:46pm
79 Views
Post# 30479008
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WHAT IS TO COME?
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WHAT IS TO COME?During partial suspension for Agrima they were allowed to continue cultivation, yes. The reason they died was the 3 who were fired remained in control of the company through majority shares. It showed puppeteering while pretending to go legit. Just cause CannTrust can hoard cannabis doesn't make it a shoe in for turn around. Anyway, have fun. There's like 6 of you in here all telling each other your big lottery day is just around the corner. It's cute. I hope one of you bakes cookies for the rest of the team.
myfistyourbutt wrote: false.
They gave agrima a chance to comply and Agrima chose not to show a proactive effort..in which then HC said you're toast..
This is all in that document you provided the board.
pulverizer wrote: They allowed Agrima to do this as well.
Then later killed them.
wizzard89 wrote: Also if HC did not have plans of reinstating their licence they sure would not have told them to continue with the last groth cycle and harvest and test that product.