Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Ucore Rare Metals Inc. V.UCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  UURAF

Ucore is focused on rare and critical-metal resources, extraction, beneficiation, and separation technologies with the potential for production, growth, and scalability. Ucore's vision and plan is to become a leading advanced technology company, providing best-in-class metal separation products and services to the mining and mineral extraction industry.


TSXV:UCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Lightningmillzon Dec 26, 2019 12:59pm
133 Views
Post# 30491457

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Nova Scotia Court

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Nova Scotia Court You guys want the NS case dismissed?  Last I checked, that case is Ucore vs IBC as Ucore is the Plaintiff on these grounds/claims:

(a)              IBC defamed Ucore by stating that it was IBC’s firm position that Ucore does not have any right to exercise [an option to purchase IBC] because, among other reasons, the parties had agreed to terminate the Option Agreement;
 
(b)             IBC committed the tort of injurious falsehood against Ucore by making the above statement with “malicious intent to cause Ucore economic harm and/or loss, without lawful excuse. IBC knew that the November 26, 2018 Press Release was untrue or was reckless as to its truth.  IBC also knew and intentionally exploited the fact that Ucore relies upon external financing principally by selling Ucore’s shares to investors”; and
 
(c)              As a result of the above, IBC lawfully interfered with Ucore’s economic relations.

We don't want this case dismissed.  Let's all make sure we are all talking the same language and the right case.  If any of this is wrong, I'll stand corrected.  Light
Bullboard Posts