Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Ucore Rare Metals Inc. V.UCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  UURAF

Ucore is focused on rare and critical-metal resources, extraction, beneficiation, and separation technologies with the potential for production, growth, and scalability. Ucore's vision and plan is to become a leading advanced technology company, providing best-in-class metal separation products and services to the mining and mineral extraction industry.


TSXV:UCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by aushedson Jan 14, 2020 3:24am
99 Views
Post# 30549721

RE:RE:RE:AIM ---- TMRC .....1 or 2 others

RE:RE:RE:AIM ---- TMRC .....1 or 2 othersLol Harvey, very obviously you haven't read the key selection criteria for the current LRE & HRE tender from AFRL:

(1) Manufacturing Capability and Experience – Proposals will be evaluated on the recipient’s degree of demonstrated capability and experience in REE separation and processing. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, intellectual property, documented manufacturing capability and experience, technical specifications, and dossiers of key personnel.

USG very clearly seeking an experienced & proven REO processor distinct from a decade of PDF's, guess that's why TMRC rushing to try and pretend some "experience", while Jim's still flat out trying to build a cardboard facade.

The evaluation criteria are comprised of five factors ranked in descending order of importance:

(1)Manufacturing Capability and Experience
(2)Quality of Technical Approach
(3)Business Viability
(4)Merchant Supplier Orientation
(5)Cost/Price 


No Magic Pudding, glossies, or BS guesswork required from where I'm sitting, just seven years hard data re development process, IP & mkt engagement in real time, tender specs actually read like they were written by Lynas' DC lobbyist.

GL with yer fantasy Harv, how much cash do you think Jim will have left end of Q after legal fees and all those colourful cardboard cut outs?
Bullboard Posts