RE:RE:Trivial, perhaps Given Fahy's need for a correction on such a basic consideration as the number of company shares while trying to determine per share values is totally amateurish.
Obviously, it seems he didn't do a professional job--he didn't do his homework. Slipshod research meant not knowing about readily availabe information. The additional fact that his critical comments on TMRC in the original version included the misidentification of the company's "mountain" is further evidence of the same. That error also has been "corrected". It required readers comments to bring this guy up-to-speed. I say trash both "versions" of the article.
"
UPDATE, 19 January 2020 "Readers* were kind enough to point out that a few pieces of data in our analysis were dated, including share count, which has grown by 29% since our first analysis was completed on 30 September 2019. This has had the effect of reducing our True Value and Target by 25%."