RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Finally closed the GAP UP left overDear Teflon,
You definitely try harder than some at your game but you still fail.
First off, a monkey could google Ultromex and learn what it is they do. Perhaps the terminology would take some time to decipher, and you may have to do more research, but ultimately you would learn that Ultromex doesn’t compete with Drosrite. Their technology is a completely different step. Now if you were up on Aluminum smelting you’d know that Sanwa, Altek, Taha, and Sceptor all compete with Pyro. Yet none of their systems are as efficient. (This is where you write down this email names, open a new browser and google each one of them). Ultromex does not do what Pyro does. Let me explain, Ultromex takes dross from the smelter. Dross either black or white contains aluminum, imagine a concrete/metallic sponge with lots, sometimes 70%, but not always . (Again google white and black dross aluminum content) Lets go with 40% aluminum in it. Ultromex takes that and processes it and removing some of that other 60% so more aluminum can be recovered prior to entering a rotary furnace. More good stuff into a rotary salt furnace means you don’t waste time processing the worthless. The rotary furnaces traditionally use a salt flux to recover the metal. Pyro does not. Pyro process it with a thermite reaction, that is metal and oxygen burning. The molten metal is removed and the whole process starts over. Your feeble mind clearly does not grasp these concepts. You demonstrated this, by highlighting a technology that does something completely different than Drosrite. Does a hammer manufacturer care if a saw manufacturer landed a contract? No. The first step is to saw the wood the second is to nail it together. Do better.
Second, and the best is “legally binding document” , oh this was rich. Let me guess Law was your first choice, but you couldn’t hack it. Now you work for someone else don’t you? I wonder do you put on a suit before you head to the office to “work” your multiple Stockhouse accounts? Hopefully you’re wearing snake skin boots to highlight your best qualities. I digress. To some it may be scary but let’s understand a bit of legal jargon. Legally binding and balance of probabilities may not sounds like the same thing but they are in fact related. Both enter the realm of civil court. A legally binding document or “contract” is an agreement between two or more parties. For instance, a letter of credit, would be legally binding. You attempt to cast doubt drawing some loose reference between Sedar filings and legally biding documents. If a CEO mislead investors he would be liable and in civil court this is based on a balance of probabilities. You are trying to infer that what Peter provides investors doesn’t have any legal weight and in fact it definitely does. Whether posted on Agoracom, Sedar or a personal email (which I guarantee you have none with Peter) he could be held liable. If it was found he knowingly mislead investors based on a balance of probabilities. What is a balance of probabilities... it’s 51%. If I were to apply your very loose and ignorant interpretation it would make Agoracom posts “legally binding”. That is not to be confused with the standard definition of legally binding document. You see you’re again comparing hammers to saws. Yes, both are used to build a house yet anyone with a basic understanding could clearly see they are different.?
If anyone read to the end, feel free to contact me for further information. Better yet ask Peter on Agoracom.
Please post more of your worthless dribble, this was mildly entertaining. You did try harder than others... good job sport.
HK