Vermilion Energy Inc T.VET

Alternate Symbol(s): VET

Energy Oil & Gas E&P

Vermilion Energy Inc. is a Canada-based international energy producer. The Company seeks to create value through the acquisition, exploration, development, and optimization of producing assets in North America, Europe, and Australia. Its business model emphasizes free cash flow generation and returning capital to investors when economically warranted, augmented by value-adding acquisitions. The Company’s operations are focused on the exploitation of light oil and liquids-rich natural gas conventional and unconventional resource plays in North America and the exploration and development of conventional natural gas and oil opportunities in Europe and Australia. The Company operates through seven geographical segments: Canada, the United States, France, Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, and Australia. In Canada, the Company is a key player in the highly productive Mannville condensate-rich gas play. It holds a 100% working interest in the Wandoo field, offshore Australia.

TSX:VET - Post by User

Vermilion Energy Inc

Bullboard Posts

Comment by clamlinguineon Jan 25, 2020 3:51pm

127 Views

Post# 30598985

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Carbon Tax

When their warming climate models failed they retroactively cooled the past to save their theory. Here is the factual evidence. It is cut and dried.

NOAA data tampering is the excuse for turning cooling into warming.

Click here for more detail. It's all there layed out so you can see it in 15 seconds.

https://realclimatescience.com/no-excuse-for-data-tampering/

You're not forced you to watch 10 minutes of irrelevant Alex Jones clips seems to be the backbone of the climate cult arguement.

Your reference to 911 is ridiculous misdirection similar to what your go to guy Potholer is forced to defer to. I had hope for his stuff when you referred me to it. The tone at the beginning was awesome but it soon deteriorated when things got tough and an explanation was required for the 800 year delay in CO2 spike after global warming had already occurred. His explanation ended up being "because science says it's ok" which isn't good enough when it is the "science" from these selected scientists we and tens of thousands of other scientists are questioning.

yggdrasilll wrote:
So the NOAA's numbers are all doctored, except when it suits you... ok...

The NOAA, NASA, IPCC, GISS, and many, many more organisations, plus scientists the world over, are all involved in a vast conspiracy. Have you ever heard of a conspiracy as complex and widespread as this one? Ever? Occam's Razor. This conspiracy theory would involve more people than 9-11 being an inside job, and almost as many as the Flat Earth conspiracy. It would be similar in scope to what anti-vaxxers believe. It would seem very improbable to me that you could get so many people to agree to a conspiracy such as this.

And what does a change in the social order mean to you? Do you think it could mean that people need to alter their way of life? Say by buying local, using mass transit, reducing their meat intake...etc.? Does that not sound like social change? That's very different from a change in the financial order, which is what you're accusing the IPCC of. That would be a change in financing from fossil fuel industries to renewable industries.

For climategate, see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP&index=6