Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CO2 GRO Inc V.GROW

Alternate Symbol(s):  BLONF

CO2 GRO Inc. is a Canada-based precision ag-tech company. The Company is focused on delivering carbon dioxide (CO2) delivery solutions to the global protected agricultural sector. Its patented technology provides the service of C-stainable crop production and pathogen perimeter protection for healthier crops by enriching plants with CO2 via an aqueous CO2 microfilm on the leaf surface. About 300 million metric ton (MT) of fruit and vegetables are grown annually from about five million hectares of protected vegetable facilities globally. The Company operates in Canada, the United States and the European Union. The Company's subsidiary is CO2 GRO (US) Inc.


TSXV:GROW - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by stockbull72on Feb 09, 2020 10:21pm
114 Views
Post# 30665265

Now we know

Now we knowWhy preference to a phone call between IR rather than detailed replies are the go to. Last I talked to Sam was over an hour on the phone. When given serious question in emails sent, replies were brief and broken and concerns were not directly addressed. Emphasis or direction usually put on 'the last news release, an event to come or who purchased shares when, at what price. I mentioned NDAS both on this board and also to Sam as being evasive, though not in direct words and felt it of far more benefit to have full disclosure, as would not that create a fight over who's getting GROW's product first and what actual benefits or results were had? Only makes sense.
Bullboard Posts