RE:RE:RE:Another mondayI know these aren't directed at me but I'm in the neighbourhood so I'll answer on behalf of the others who can tweak to their hearts' content afterwards.
1) 5 Years or around the time when Jeff's first batch of stock options expire (December 2020). That is the minimum to let them get through the business plan and this is loosely based on success stories like Red Bull and Monster Energy (My initial investment was 10K @ .25 in October 2016).
2) Somewhat dissatisfied at the communications (ease of interpretation) and continually missing the set guidance. Holding because we have the right team in place (I think) and this could be a home run given we have started in California with endless opportunity in a market segment that currently doesn't 'really' exist. IE: We have a huge chance to be a disruptive technology to alcohol consumption and if you read and re-read NEDSTARK's post that is a pretty good summary of the value proposition we have here (PS I like it better when Rick says 'value proposition'), Might be because he has half a mil invested.
3) Not sure yet, but if another team with better communications, similar products and more accurate guidance emerged, I would at minimum offload some of my TNY holdings and make it a two horse race. (BTW, history shows this happens all the time...someone comes along and does it better).
IF is the key word and I don't think number 3 is happening in the near term but it is always easier to replicate and improve something than to create it from scratch.
Anyways, don't get me wrong here everyone, I'm not here to piss and moan but for over three years we still have some of the same issues that need to be cleaned up. They tackle those and we are gravy. Couldn't hurt to actually do some of the things they have said they would too.
Perhaps it will come in time with the experience of just doing it but to me three plus years is a long time to be making the same mistakes (IE: Cryptic comms and missed guidance).
Opinions are like @$$h0l3$, we all have one!
MJ1