RE:RE:RE:RE:PI Financial target - $1.50Aww, I knew you couldn't keep away for long my little twatwaffle. Wanna get that sock out of your mouth now? my zipper is back in order lol
brentkosta wrote: Ya what a bumb, he was WAY off. Supreme fell about 30% below his target. Rotfl
Go0B3r wrote: Zamparo is a twatwaffle with a desk job, he's probably paid by the shorts to report poorly on companies they want to short and that's why he's never right. I've made a few trades opposite to his because of that fundament alone and I've made out like a bandit(in companies I have no clue wtf they do). This one fell on my lap lol and the stack of paper the shorts have to cover here is absolutely funny af!
PI financial Target of $1.50 is based on Supreme earning $50mm this year...
theTransporter wrote: Jason Zandberg (PI Financial) has a much better rating than John Zamparo (CIBC) as an analyst.
Jason put out a price target of $1.50 based on FIRE posting $13.5M revenue on Thursday and a reduction in the guidance.
John back in January reduced his price target of FIRE from $1.25 to $0.65.
Jason is ranked 2,243 out of 5,894 analysts on Tip Ranks, while John is ranked 5,593 our of 5,894 (almost last) on Tip Ranks.
Jason Zandberg is far more credible than John Zamparo.
Jason Zandberg - FIRE target of $1.50 Analyst Profile
Jason Zandberg
PI Financial
Wall Street Analyst
Ranked #2,243 out of 5,894 Analysts on TipRanks (#4,229 out of 13,075 overall experts)
Jason Zandberg's Performance
14 out of 48 ratings were successful
+5.0%
Average return per rating
Each rating is measured over a period, and compared to .
Jonh Zamparo - FIRE target of $0.65 Analyst Profile
John Zamparo
CIBC
Wall Street Analyst
Ranked #5,593 out of 5,894 Analysts on TipRanks (#12,614 out of 13,075 overall experts)
John Zamparo's Performance
8 out of 29 ratings were successful
-18.0%
Average return per rating
Each rating is measured over a period, and compared to .