OTCQX:GTBAF - Post by User
Comment by
Goaweighon Feb 13, 2020 12:14pm
153 Views
Post# 30686439
RE:RE:Not quite what I expected but then what else is new.
RE:RE:Not quite what I expected but then what else is new. Thanks for that.
Even after owning this for quite awhile I'm still not certain what I'm actually looking at.
I do understand the big picture, I think, but it's the pieces that don't make sense to me yet.
Maybe it's just the way they report assays that are over my head.
I want simple like : From 0 - 100 meters ( 100 meters of 1 gram ) and from 100 -101 meters ( 1 meter of 5 grams ) and from 101 - 200 ( 99 meters of 1.5 grams )
So now using my pea brain I can sortof figure we have around 200 meters of a little over 1 gram with a raisen of 5 grams in the middle.
I see this type of reporting elsewhere but here is differant.
But of course maybe the orebody is differant.
Maybe those assays are there and I need to go back and look.
Anyway I'm not complaining, I have cartoons to look at and even if I don't understand the minutia of every assay the market seems to understand and is responding positively.
Not being a Geo with grade control expertice I have to put my faith in the market and so far it's worked out pretty well. diabase1 wrote: Goaweigh: My feeling is that the thickness in the middle of the LP Fault is related to a depression in the mafic volcanics (footwall). As you go to the NW and SE, there are no more depressions and thus the mineralizing horizons will be thinner.