Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Emerald Health Therapeutics Inc TBQBF


Primary Symbol: EMHTF

Healthcare Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Cannabis
Emerald is committed to creating new consumer experiences with distinct recreational, medical and wellness-oriented cannabis products with an emphasis on innovation and production excellence.


OTCQB:EMHTF - Post by User

Emerald Health Therapeutics Inc > A Billion MC and Now $40 Million - What Happened?
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(50)
•••
Comment by DanielDarden123on Feb 14, 2020 6:36pm
215 Views
Post# 30694098

RE:A Billion MC and Now $40 Million - What Happened?

RE:A Billion MC and Now $40 Million - What Happened?The answer is always complex in these situations but here much simpler IMO. When an issuer discloses a conflict of interest that is FAR different than avoiding a conflict of interest. When the supply agreement with EHS was consummated an obvious conflict was created. EHS, as the large holder of EMH, was to provide the feedstock to EMH but how would a dispute be resolved? Obviously in favour of EHS as the founder/promoter would benefit more from the success of EHS than EMH. 

The lesson is simple. When a conflict of interest is apparent don’t walk. RUN! The conflict of interest is created to benefit the founder only and the Board will know but do nothing in most cases because they have been appointed by the founder. 
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities