RE:RE:RE:RE:Seems Like a lost opportunity to get things rightSocialism at work...
and Tcheck like many others are right into it...be carefull what you wish for.
In US Trump is unduing the regulations Obama put in place....the more you regulate the harder for businesses to survive, the more Governament gets involved the more Socialist
but this phraze is scary:
they will have to step in for the good of all .a concept that is foreign to you . are not investors .they are overseers . I was raised in a Socialist Communist Country...I escaped that to come here, I don't want my kids having to go through what I went through....
I do not need "Overseers" to tell me what I am allowed to do, what I am allowed to eat, how many kids I am allowed to have, where I can travel for my holidays and soo on, the list is long...
Remember Tcheck, NOTHING IS FREE, FREE things are very expensive, most of the time it cost you and your kids your FREEDOM.
In Socialist Countries people go to jail for speaking up...look at what already happens in the world, if you are Conservative/Republican you go to Jail and if you are Left you get a free pass for the same or worse thing...
back to the "Bailouts", Bombardier got a TAX payer Bailout, did the TAX payer ever get their money back when Bombardier SP went up?
How is it fair that investors in Bombardier got paid when Bombardier got a bailout but the TAX payer didn't?
Do you call that Wealth transfer from the working people (Conservatives) to the wanna get rich fast loser Socialists that invested in wrong Company with brainwashed views?
Tcheck wrote:
tsfa fubnds
you are naive
governments are involved in everything .
(in the us it is 1 person who is involved in everything .= monocratie)
more ,gov have a duty to direct the economy and more and more to regulate its excesses .
they cant go on accepting that companies fleece investors or the public .
they certainly cant be the ones promoting that behaviour or take part in that behaviour .
they will have to step in for the good of all .a concept that is foreign to you . are not investors .they are overseers . .
normally they withdraw after rescue .or provide funds to
they make things happenning .
they live from taxes and are dependent on the thriving economy for that .
every pharmaceutical gets incentives to establish themselves somewhere .
they are in nal for starters .rescue op ? IQ took the company private ?then partnered with amperex .the separation private public is vague .non existent .
why are the companies lobbying politicians .out of charity of course .
that doesnt stop you from supporting sayona s bid against an hypothetical nmx bid .
as long as it is not nmx .
sayona is insignificant but in the running .nmx is valuable but not in the running ?
amperex (was in nal ) couldnt do it
who will ? nmx without gb maybe .gb messed nmx up .
there is hope now .
.quebec without fitzgibbon ? we will have to see .
QC better put some thought in it this time around .
we dont seem to learn from previous mistakes .
behaves like a province not a country.
lithium is the new fuel of the economy .
some dominated the world selling oil
now new industries are emerging equally powerful but clean .
i am exagerating as always
just kidding