GREY:NMKEF - Post by User
Comment by
TFSAfundson Mar 02, 2020 8:51pm
91 Views
Post# 30758765
RE:i never defended pallinghurst deal for tfsa
RE:i never defended pallinghurst deal for tfsaTcheck... Dec 21st;
pallinghurst is acceptable because the offer implicates all the shareholders .anybody of us can benefit from the downfall of this company by entering at bottom rock prices .thts why the deal will be accepted by the majority of the shareholders .
even GB. From below; i only said if there was a 25 cents deal then any price under 25 would have been a give away . You have said before that you want at least 25¢, isn't that the Pallinghurst deal?
of course there was never a serious deal on the table .
Funny, that's not what EVERYONE was saying prior to Christmas... just that Pallinghurst had to wrap up their DD. lol And some still maintain the deal is still there because of one sentence on the Pallinghurst Group Investment page!!!
Oh... and just to set the record straight... I am not currently holding any NMX shares! I have bought and sold some waves. I lost $13.90 the last ride, my buy and sell commissions. I paid attention to Calgary, maybe you should have also instead of buying another 10K in November! And are you now going to ask what I'm doing here since I'm not a shareholder??? Tcheck wrote: i thought that arrangement was a give away and a betrayal frankly . .
a give away to a buddy of GB .sitting on the same board of directors in another company .NOU
so tsfa funds you are confusing me by wanting to make a point .it disappoints sorry .
i start doubting about my own point of views when i read you .
i only said if there was a 25 cents deal then any price under 25 would have been a give away .
of course there was never a serious deal on the table .
it couldnt be because nordic trust wouldn `t let them in a million years and they knew it .
i hate it when management can deceive without paying for it .
project was fully funded another joke .
is this your capitalism ? = world without regulations .just joking
you are the only investor on this forum who doesn t want his money back .
calgary is not an investor so i can t speak for him .
you are one of those who don t want other investors to get their money back .
that is strange .there you ressemble nitwit calgary .
but it must be coincidental or coincimental .