Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Neo Lithium Corp V.NLC


Primary Symbol: NTTHF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
Neo Lithium Corp is engaged in the business of exploration operations. Its principal business activities are the exploration and development of resource properties. Its project includes the 3Q project. It operates its business in the countries like Canada and Argentina, however, most of the revenue is generated from Canada.


OTCQX:NTTHF - Post by User

Neo Lithium Corp > Gates backs lithium-processing that omits evaporation ponds
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(4)
•••
Comment by neoscepticon Mar 04, 2020 11:01am
51 Views
Post# 30765304

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Gates backs lithium-processing that omits evaporation ponds

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Gates backs lithium-processing that omits evaporation pondsI hope that there is a postive reason for the delay.
Now, the best way to get JV is to have low CAPEX (achieved) and very low OPEX. 
Reduction of chemicals used for battery grade would cut in both, their cost and transportation. 
If OPEX will get below 2.5K/tonne, NLC will be top JV partner candidate.

If they have problems with chemistry - two options: OPEX will be up or maybe the chemist is not up to the task. 

ML has consistently 30-40% premium over NLC, despite of clear NLC advantage in deposit size and quality. NLC should have 50% advantage. The difference is location and management. Not like NLC's management is bad (I would not be here), they are average or just above it. ML has a heavyweight...Abasov. 
LAC is defientely good, but Abasov factor makes ML looks good too. Argentina's risks is, probably, a joke for him after Ethiopia.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities