RE:RE:simple mathhello minepic. thanks for the response. assuming what you say is true, then why did erin try to sell of 75% of the property for a lousy $25million? and why were we happy with that? of course i.m talking about the multi-INVESTCOS that have dissipitated.
p.s - if they are still interested, why are we giving up 75% for only $25 million?
we could make more in a complete sale than that partnership. yet, they bagged out, strung us along and are not seeing this $11/sh price you talk about.
to all responders, please answer all the issues i bring up not just 1 or 2 of them. they are intertwined, please respond to all i bring up.
thank you, simply, a concerned stockholder.