RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Business ReviewGreat post!
rk67 wrote:
I've been watching and holding for a while now. I have 250k shares, not a huge number by some standards, not a small number by others. I have two stories to share, one positive, one negative, so ... :-)
Negative: I was once invested in a gold mining company. Their first press release was, "we struck gold!". Three months later, "we have secured the mining rights to the land!". Three months later, "We now have a drill!" Three months later "The drill is on the land!" Three months later "The drill broke!" Three months later "The drill is repaired!" Three months later ... you get the idea. I feel that Tinley is like that, a bit, at times.
Positive: I'm in the technology sector as my day job. The lessons I've learned are the same ones that everybody else has learned -- it's not the guys at the bottom that make the money, but the guys at the top. It's not the tomatoe farmers that make the money, it's the ketchup makers. Not the potato farmers, but the fast food industry. Not the operating system makers, but the system integrators. In Tinley's case, we're seeing that exact same thing. It's not the growers of THC that make money, it's the people who take that "commodity generic drug" and do something with it that make money. That's Tinley.
I hope I'm more positive than negative. Time will tell.
GLTA!