RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Insider activity Richy77 If you check the thread....again...you will note that I expressed the opinion that the insider transactions were meaningless in the context of the point GreenArrowup presented it. The insider owns quite a few million shares....that was my answer. You decided to ask for legal opinions on that very subject on a bulletin board of all places and did so in a way that could also lead the uninitiated to think the transactions may be problematic. I simply pointed out that this is not the place to seek that opinion and once again suggested that doing the math should lead you to concluding that there is no there there..... So I suggest you focus your efforts on getting educated on the subject that appears to concern you