Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Post by pierregon Apr 09, 2020 4:58pm
301 Views
Post# 30895859

Royalty leverage

Royalty leverageRoyalty leverage

@Nihilism:
https://ceo.ca/rnx?c995bc9884e1 & https://ceo.ca/rnx?65fd6c25df64
« MMX has leverage in that sense, that they don't have to move. But RNX has leverage in that they don't have to mine. So both companies host some leverage to work it out. MMX lowering the royalty, but including a clause about minimum mining amounts, or putting in a tiered system whereby the royalty lessens as more gold is produced, could earn them more money overall while still allowing RNX more profit for increasing mined tonnes and giving them incentive to do so. »
[…]
« If both managements are fair and reasonable, both companies could earn more from a tiered royalty or turning the royalty into a gold purchasing agreement or some other scheme which encourages RNX to mine, while still getting MMX stable revenue. »

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>