Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Critical Elements Lithium Corp V.CRE

Alternate Symbol(s):  CRECF

Critical Elements Lithium Corporation is a Canada-based lithium exploration company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and processing of critical minerals mining properties in Canada. Its projects include Rose Lithium-Tantalum, Rose North, Rose South, Arques, Bourier, Dumulon, Duval, Nisk, Lemare, Caumont, and Valiquette. The Rose Lithium-Tantalum property consists of over 473 claims covering a total area of over 24.99 square kilometers (km2). It lies in the northeastern part of Superior Province, within the Eastmain greenstone belt. The Rose North property consists of about 31 claims covering a total area of over 16.14 km2. The Arques Property is composed of one block totaling around 136 claims covering an area of 6,840.93 hectares (ha) over 18 kilometers (kms) in length in a Southwest-Northeast direction. Bourier Property is comprised of over 304 claims with an area of 15,616.47 ha for over 30 kms. Rose South property consists of over 280 claims.


TSXV:CRE - Post by User

Comment by Jordswordon Apr 28, 2020 1:00pm
114 Views
Post# 30962548

RE:RE: Permits: Something stinks

RE:RE: Permits: Something stinksThank you for the re-assurance Bullish. When I read the post by Nflyby it had questions/concerns highlighted in yellow and red. Some of them seemed very pointed and were about specific items that needed to be addressed. Not exactly generic I guess is what I am saying. Were some of those maybe outdated and have since been corrected? I tried reading the report directly online but kept going in circles with the links so I am going off what other people are posting here.

thanks for the help!
Bullboard Posts