RE:RE:The Magic ElixirGoing way back to the May 2018 Investor deck - slide 16 - it looks like the biomass used in APP process yeilds a total THC recovery of ~90% --> 60% BNO (oil) + 30% Infuz (water).
Compared to traditional (competitors) who only get the 60% (oil) in their CO2 extractions and 0% water-soluble.
So...It may take more biomass to yield the per mg Infuz ingredient, but SPR is getting more out of the plant than anyone else - including a water-solube product.
munchtrade wrote: ScotiaOne wrote:
Is the ingredient too expensive?
I think for beverages specifically, Infuz20 is more expensive vs. the traditional oil method, only because you need more biomass to get the same comparable amount. Don't remembr in what video I heard it last year, but it was indicated that there is approx 90% recoverable content from biomass using APP, however, that amount is roughtly split between Infuz20 and oil. So, call it 45% recoverable Infuz20, vs. 60-70% traditional oil extraction.
Having said that, the APP process seems much simplier than other extraction techniques, so perhaps cost savings can be recouped there.