SUMKNDV1DERFL wrote: JuiceLee wrote: SUMKNDV1DERFL wrote: JuiceLee wrote:
Blizzy420 wrote: Exaclt.y. The reagent recipe is the secret sauce. This is why they will develop the Infuz2o and sell it instead of providing the reagents and proces to someone else. If they give the reagent to someone else they can simply reverse engineer the additives and formulate their own reagent concoction.
Sen, IBS and $prout have attempted to build a moat around the patent so it cannot be stolen or bought out by a competitor for pennies on the dollar.
Anyone that wants to look up how this works please look up "continuation applications" for patents. This is how you prolong the patent application and add more "webs" of protection.
Also as I have stated before, as an everyday CBD consumer, the last thing you want for your CBD product is the benefits of CBD to have a fast offset. CBD is not like THC. The more CBD I take I do not get enhanced effects of it to a certain point.
Nano emulsion imo is perfect for CBD consumption, the catalyst behind APP tech's success will be the THC scalability.
I am very curious as to why you would prefer a nano emulsified product over an all natural product. The only product thus far that boasts an all natural extraction process with absolutely zero chemical residue is APP.
I do not care who sets the levels of acceptable toxins in a consumable and to what level, but I for one would rather a toxin free product.
Also, the off set of BNO can be up to 8 hours or beyond. The plan for $PR was to design tinctures and oils to last. Hence their mention of Infuz20/BNO mixed capsules to offer quick onset and long lasting effects. Like Advil or Tylenol. To say that the bread and butter for $PR/APP lays in THC products is preposterous. The real money will be in functional beverages and CBD over the counter products. THC products are only the tip of the iceberg. They are a means to enter and establish the MJ space for the big conglomerates to swoop in when stats and market are solid.
Pls explain the benefits of nano oil processes over APP. Maybe I missed something Tim, or did you invest in $PR only for the THC bev products?
Actually nano emulsions is not even my first choice. It would be my 3rd or 4th choice... and water soluble CBD anything would be no where on my list. I use it for pain, I take a grain size of 3 times a day and I am covered all day and that's using RSO. Now tell me how often I would need one of these water soluble beverages for a full day of coverage and how many of them? I buy a vile of RSO and it lasts me 2 weeks. I get you have high hopes for CBD beverages and I hope you are right as far as Sproutly's success, but again as a daily consumer of CBD I could care less about beverages, but very excited for the water soluble THC beverages as far as dosing/onset/offset.
Perhaps we are on different pages here or there is some sort of misunderstanding. You said..
”Nano emulsion imo is perfect for CBD consumption, the catalyst behind APP tech's success will be the THC scalability.”
This is the part of your post to which I was responding. The APP extraction for oil is superior to that of the solvent extraction in terms of no toxic residue. I’d rather use an all natural product myself. I cannot see the benefit of a solvent extraction method over APP.
As for CBD/Hemp Infuz20 infused products such as bevs, you cannot compare the bevs to oils as they are two separate products. Infuz20 and BNO have two different purposes. However, as per Dr Sen and Dolo, these two products can be combined for quick onset and long lasting oil affects. So if you are comparing oils then compare BNO and or Infuz20 but not Infuz20 alone.
Confusing as it may be, nano emulsion for CBD in my opinion is inferior. At the end of the day it is oils suspended in what ever junk that can contain it. If you want pain relief you won’t pop into 7-11 for a sugar filled nano CBD Bev. You will buy an oil CBD that actually works. Currently all we have are toxin filled CBD oil extracts. Until $PR gets of their a$$es and actually markets something. So, I still do not understand why you would say “nano emulsion is perfect for CBD consumption.”. If I am buying a wellness drink with CBD, I would not consider nano emulsions a healthy choice.
For one, no one knows where the particles end up. Second, I do not want to wait to feel the calm soothing wellness affects of the CBD an hour after consuming. Thirdly, I would like a refreshing and tasty beverage free of after tastes and oil slicked coating on the roof of my mouth. So, can you tell me why nano emulsion is the perfect CBD process for consumables? Also, pls elaborate on why THC products will be the money maker for $PR and not CBD products. I am confused as to why you believe the range of audience for THC would be more lucrative than that of CBD.