Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Great Bear Resources Ltd. GTBDF


Primary Symbol: GTBAF

Great Bear Resources Ltd. is a Vancouver-based gold exploration company focused on advancing its 100% owned Dixie project in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. A significant exploration drill program is currently underway to define the mineralization within a large-scale, high-grade disseminated gold discovery made in 2019, the LP Fault. Additional exploration drilling is also in progress to expand and infill nearby high-grade gold zones, as well as to test new regional targets.


OTCQX:GTBAF - Post by User

Comment by Goaweighon May 11, 2020 12:35pm
150 Views
Post# 31012502

RE:RE:RE:RE:IROC Trading Halt - GBR

RE:RE:RE:RE:IROC Trading Halt - GBR So you're worried it's only going to $ 13.00 today instead of $ 13.25 ?
Golly that's tragic.


Bullchart1 wrote: Sure wish these results had come out tomorrow when Gold is expected to recover. Will see how the bidding goes with all the gold stocks a hit


Bullchart1 wrote: Looking for a sizable gap up on open. 


goindeeper wrote:
Hopefully the halt is for the rest of the assay results from BR-118.

Drill section 20650 shows two interpreted gold mineralized zones where assay results were not reported.  The one in basalt is especially intriguing as it may be similar to the hinge and limb zone veins.  Note that it even has the red mineralization markings but no assay results were reported beyond 231 m.  Not sure why they wouldn't have included the assay results for that interval unless there was a delay at the lab or samples had to be re-assayed for confirmation of grade. 

 




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>