Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Great Bear Resources Ltd. GTBAF

Great Bear Resources Ltd. is a Vancouver-based gold exploration company focused on advancing its 100% owned Dixie project in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. A significant exploration drill program is currently underway to define the mineralization within a large-scale, high-grade disseminated gold discovery made in 2019, the LP Fault. Additional exploration drilling is also in progress to expand and infill nearby high-grade gold zones, as well as to test new regional targets.


OTCQX:GTBAF - Post by User

Comment by lumpy13on May 14, 2020 7:39pm
150 Views
Post# 31030510

RE:Share structure is tight.

RE:Share structure is tight.CT and his team have done an outstanding job.  And the 2% NSR to existing shareholders was especially creative and something I'd never seen before.

My guess is that the mid/large miners are keeping a close eye on this, challenged by the dynamic of the more they wait, the more expensive GBR will become, while also firming up what it really has.  An interesting trade-off.

Acquisitions in the AU space are starting and will grow.  At some point, someone is going to go after GBR and the question will be at what premium to the market price.  My guess is that it'd have to be significant - at least 75% - to persuade shareholders, and at 75% premium most shareholders would sell.  Also a question of whether the 2% NSR would be sold as well as part of the package.  (And that's why CT was smart with creating the NSR, as it's another bargaining chip.)


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>