Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. T.KGI


Primary Symbol: T.KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is a Canada-based gold mining, development, and exploration company with a diversified portfolio of exploration projects. The production profile of the company includes the Macassa mine complex located in northeastern Ontario and the Fosterville gold mine located in the State of Victoria, Australia. Also, the company owns the Holt mine and the Detour mine. The company's mines and material mineral projects are located in Canada and Australia.


TSX:KL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by westcoast2019on Jun 06, 2020 1:48am
317 Views
Post# 31119471

RE:Return on cash v buy back

RE:Return on cash v buy back
JRafflesUK wrote:
At a PE of 13.1 (StockHouse), the earnings return per share is 7.63% (100/13.1) with growth prospects.
 
The cash held by KL may generate ~ 1%
 
It does not seem to be a complex decision of But Back or Hold Cash
 

When you put it that way it makes a lot of sense. Of course they should hold back enough for current exporation expenses , possible Detour Lake Expansion etc. 
Nevertheless on weakness buying back some shares seems a good use of otherwise idle capital.

The trick of course is to know what share price is a weak price but I would saythat  when its under $50 CDN and especially if the shareprice is on a downtrend on a given daythat some buying from KL woud be appropriate.

Increasing the dividend might b nice but that should probably be done sparingly so as to keep it growing annualy  but still in line with other larger producer dividend rates.
 
A lower share count not only will tend to increase the share price over time but will still leave useful room to use  shares as currency in any future takeovers , meanwhile the resulting  higher shareprice and less available free cash might tend to  discourage Newmont Barrick etc. from trying for a cheap takeout of KL.
Bullboard Posts