RE:RE:@ gold price $1500 NPV@ 5 % = $339 million. Just had a quick reading og the Tetra Tech Technical Report NI-43-101 (Sedar) dated 11 May 2016, and it would appear that all cost figures are in US dollars (could someone confirm?) hence the NPV values (@5%) on slide 11 would be in USD, which means US $500M x 1.25 = Cdn $625M which is better. But to be conservative $500M (in Cdn) would be good enough as an extrapolated NPV for USD 1700/oz.
GH11
----------------------------
goldhunter11 wrote: artofwar,
A quick way to find out approximately the NPV for 1700/0z is by extrapolation of the results shown in Slide 11 of the corp presentation (link below). The results would be good enough for us non-professional number cruncher: With a hand drawn graph on a piece of paper, one could get something like an NPV of about $500M (assuming it's Cdn $) for US$1700/oz, which is quite good compared to a Market Cap of $165M (at $0.75/s).
It should be noted that, this PEA was for a constrained pit, hence any increase in the RE resulting from an enlarged pit (extended in the north, west, south, NW covering the "projected corridor" leading to Cleary Hill Mine (Slide 13), and depth would increase the NPV by a significant factor, judging from the potential additional RE from these potential expansions.
There would be no use for Kinross to pretend to sleep during a development just few km north of their Fort Knox Mine, which is running out of ores in a few years. FVL has resumed its drilling, Phase 1 with 10000 m starting with hole GSDL2002 (16 June 2020 NR).
GH11
-----------------------------------