RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Investors Beware - Do your homework Minister, I think you are misunderstanding the situation and twisting the facts to support a very negative narrative (in a previous post stating no end-users are getting fuel savings - this is completely false) Now, you aren't entirely wrong as clearly there has been challenges and delays which is why units haven't "flown off the shelves" as you put it. The proof is in the pudding as they say, and if you look out there, you can see many of the long-time trialers are still in the fold (recently a Loblaw truck was spotted with an HG1-45). I tried to explain previously, it appears this company is in the late stages commercializing this technology, which is why until only recently have sales commenced.
In regards to KarbonKleen, Brian Semkiw's firm 3rdGP was first engaged and upon liking what they saw, further deepened their relationship thus creating KarbonKleen in order to go beyond software and also sell hardware.
From the original release:
"Mr. Semkiw said, “What has drawn me to dynaCERT is the opportunity to merge two distinct disciplines, Engineering/Manufacturing and Payments Processing. dynaCERT has engineered an excellent product that has numerous benefits for its customers, but most significantly, is the impressive reduction of toxic greenhouse gases (GHG). I see my job as helping the company to monetize those reductions with Fintech innovation not present in the world today. Digitizing the complete process, from the tokenization of carbon credits to their trading on the existing openly regulated currency exchanges is not only an immense potential for dynaCERT but is a massive opportunity with multi-government tailwinds already predisposed to the success of the project. This is a very exciting time for dynaCERT and I am very pleased to be part of the team.”
Stating dynaCERT couldn't sell units to anyone else so they created a shadow or sister company is a bit of a stretch. This can be debunked as their 250 units to the US seem to be mostly delayed and trials continue, suggesting the goal isn't simply to "sell units to themselves"
Karbonkleen is clearly having success (they posted fleet results for month of April) and continue to march in large-fleet clients. Why would they keep starting new trials if the tech simply didn't work. That would be a big waste of time and money.
This has always been a long-term play, and like any R&D company, there will be delays and challenges. Now perhaps dynaCERT could do a better job communicating with investors but anyway. The reality is, this is a game-changing technology that continues to improve and evolve. After 15 long years, we seem to be close to delivering a much-needed global solution to reduce emissions and a significant cost-saver.
Now, with any game-changing technology, there will always be skeptics and naysayers and we can debate this infinitely, but the bottom line is, we will just have to wait and see if they can deliver.
I personally think this is a hundred-bagger in the making and am invested accordingly.