Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Uranium Participation Corp URPTF



GREY:URPTF - Post by User

Comment by ShakeUpTheBoardon Jul 01, 2020 8:20am
168 Views
Post# 31211619

RE:RE:What Value is Denison Providing to UPC?

RE:RE:What Value is Denison Providing to UPC?

A message needs to be sent to the Board that shareholders do not approve of their actions to tie the company's hands to a $2M a year payment to Denison with no exit option.  At best, a reasonable contract would have a 90 day cancellation clause without cause.  Signing off on a 3 year penalty is not indicative of a Board who is working in the best interests of the shareholders (it's indicative of a Board that has been handpicked by the Denison management team).

Make sure you exercise your vote and select "withhold" when re-electing these Board members who are not acting in the company's best interest.  Also, Kopernik Global Investors and Wellington Management Company can hopefully also realize, since they are UPC's most significant shareholders, that the Board's actions are detrimental to the company's long-term value.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>