EASTERN MYSTICISM ?VIDEO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KucUhclqm7g&feature=youtu.be
18:44 - 19:23 min mark
CEO takes the eastern villenuve - charge/resistivity - trend down to - 100m
19:23 min mark chuckle
The majority of eastern drills = hit gold at shallow depths...
suggesting small narrownear surface veins
would be interesting to see the shallow core ores andcompare to the other deep iron ore gold cores - my hunch - shallow is an entirely different ore body than what is deeper below on trend of the Scad and north and south pits -
18:44 - 19:23 min mark in video -
chuckle - with a comment pertaining to the topical, resistivity in relation to the - 100m depth resistivity - what did he say comparing the surface to 100m depth ? " There is correlation - ( visual anomaly ) - but just not at this depth "
MY OPINION ?
Quit tinkering with the 3-d graphics -
Inversions might be skewed
Revert back to this resistivity map
Think - vertical longatude folds that are inline with the existing 3 mines running north to south
The oddity is - why does the 3-D model charge map show a pink " S " while this map below - shows near same S pattern on an angle and sdshifted further west - explain that - lol
https://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/db46991d-b23a-4e34-8eef-1cfce0f4d441?size=0
QUESTION How accurate is the 3-D ressitivity survey - program for eastern anomalies ?
M to M HIT GOLD/gr
| 11.76 | 16.89 | 5.13 | yes | 27.2 |
Let's look at drill hole SM 20 - 041
Cross-section of hole SM-20-041
BMK - hit gold right out of the gates - near surface - 11m to 17m = 27.2 grams - 5.13m
To go in opposition of my own opinion and favor the 3-D resistivity survey
what proceedure needs to be performed to prove the 3-D model is a correct reading ?
SIMPLE -
Where BMK first hit the gold - one simply drills on the same pitch of gold
Drill a 300m hole - it would pass through a good 100m of the sweet spot right into the heavier resistivity Then...a second hole vertical - stepout 50m to the left of diagram
to catch the 5m sweet spot at a deeper depth - to complete the testing of 3-D anomaly.
Analyze the surface gold ores = are they a different style of gold ore ?
s the surface gold an entirely different system - alkai ?
Versus an iron gold ore below ?
Two different ore systems ?
If my own theroy is correct...
Hole 46 - wil have shallow intercepts.
If 3-D model is corerect - and the 2 drill models performed above
and did hit the 5m zonation - then... 3-D model i'd run with...
Cheers...That's al lthe effort i'm putting into this.
It's not a difficult project...most likely two different formations...
Treat as two - formatrions - ( alkai soda + iron ) not to be confuse with a single formation.
Sometimes technology can make a project more complex than it is.
I'd be sticking to the 3 pit gold trends - building upon these - verifying if they're on folds
running vertical drills along this 3 pit formation - with even deeper drills - looking for deeper gold - aiming foer the thick red line under the pink belly intrusion.