COULD CURRENT DRILL PLOT Reveal, a signature trait of, Lenticular mineralized patterning ?
- Erase Monaco
- Erase Bristol
- Erase Villeneuve
- Erase the 2 small red lines and 1 green
https://macdonaldmines.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Fig.-3-North_Pit_DDH_Highlights_.png
Analyse just the Scad Mine
Then, analyse the dril lintercepts
Then, begin at the Scad and draw a lenticular vortex ( infinity circle ) that expands outwardly
away from the Scad - would the current drill hits land on a predictable radius that would fit the mold of, vortex ? Keep in mind - other deposits - nearby - have traits of, lenticular patterning - spiral shape.
If chasing the deep red charge anomalies - let's ask where did they hit gold ?
153m above the red charge anaomlay, based on the 3-D charge map of 289m red target.
Drill hole 46 seen gold to - 133m
capped at 200m
red charge anomaly was at 289m
Therefore - gold was well above the red anomaly.
And if hole was drilled to 200m = leaves 67m above the 200m drill depth.
So...could this be a diseminated ore body from a northly source that reconsolodated ?
Could it have deveolped a vortex pattern deposit.
One way of knowing is...begin at teh Dcad mine and trace a vortex circle that encompasses each drill hit to see if the drill hits align ot a outward infinity circle -
If conclusive - it would mean a somewhat predictable pattern might be feasable.
It would be nice to see - what is on the other side of the bristol breccia - if a vortex circle exits...
What makes me think this way ?
Simply put - if the gold is onstrike - then, it would most likely follow the folds...
Yet...BMK is following a differnt strike path that is not on folds based on google maps.
And...if current monaco was correct = it would mean the gold would be onstrike north to south. Yet... is it ?
If it were = Monaco would have gold on the path of north to south strike.
But...there have been gaps - along this north + south strike - which begs why would a strike have gaps ? Could it be because of an infinity pattern might exist ?
Clearly identifying the charge colors above surface and below to a depth of 170m
and correlating each drill hit to charge map - just might map this area to a - T - and... stepping out even with exploratory holes using a smaller drill - drilling vertically -
as scout holes - in an infinity pattern - could be the trick...
Remember, drill hole 46 - the gold was well above the 289m red anomaly.
Gold can't come from a lower target and place itself atop at shallower lenes, if proving the deep red anomalies are - source.
Cheers...
I think drill hole 46 was a superb - intercept.
That is... if the 22m intercept was all of, 1.5/ g and...not adjusted or compensated by other intercepts in same hole - thast may have been higher grades that assisted the - 22m intercept.
Is the 3-D charge map is same above as it is below - in ore charactterization ?
Drill hole 46 didn't begin in red - it began in a yellow muted red - then...at a deeper depth passed over the red anomaly... but...is this, red anomlay also present at a shallower depth, or, only apparent at 289m ?
Drill holes - 44 -35 = duds
Where am i headed with this ?
If we look at hole 46 - in muted yelloow + red
Can this be construded as....diseminated iorn ores reconsolodated in chlorites
muted reds - not solid iron ore
muted yellow - chlorites and salts solidified
COULD CHASING THE muted yelow and red zones be more productive searching for
a secondary reconsolodated resource ore body ?
Here, have a look - there's a huge mass of muted yellows and reds...
Below drill hole 46 and all above hole 46 - all the way to the north pit zone where BMK
had incredible results...could this muted yellow and red = be the ticket ?
Could it be a signal of widely diseminated irons + salts that reconsolodated with - gold ?
Just ideas...
Keep em, throw em, use em...
As it is... the yellow and red muted coloration does have a lenticular pattern - curvature.