Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.


GREY:NMKEF - Post by User

Comment by mick1888on Jul 09, 2020 5:28pm
64 Views
Post# 31248234

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Another extension to Sept 4th?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Another extension to Sept 4th?Tfunds, I have no idea whether the extension to 4 September is needed, but it is better to be safe than sorry (it's a sorry enough tale as it is)..... ;-)

With regards to the bid extension - if more time means more on the table or more bidders competing, excellent. I couldn't care less if it was achieved five minutes before the existing deadline as long as the outcome is in our favour.... ;-)

GLTA longs

TFSAfunds wrote: mick, the extension of the SISP bid deadline by the debtors was submitted on Friday June 26th and granted on Monday June 29th... one business day later! So, do you really think an extension here, over a month away, is needed at this time? Maybe a bidder (the only one? lol) needs extra time to come up with some cash to close the deal? This way the favouritism is hidden, not that that would ever occur in such a proceeding in the province of Quebec... lol

mick1888 wrote: CalAB, quite simple really. They are only safeguarding the project from the 'circling sharks' as you gleefully remind us of. Wouldn't it be the ultimate farce if they agreed a deal but ran out of time to close it.... ;-)
 




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>